Monday, October 17, 2011

Ron Smith

For virtually all the time I spent in politics, my main function was to craft words for someone else.  
And, for a long time, I was pretty good at it. In fact, I got so good at it that, when I finally decided I wanted to start opining under my own name again, it took some adjustment.
The biggest change was learning how to resist the urge to self-edit, to choose my words against an internal calculus weighted in favor of what I should say at the expense of what I wanted to say.
But once I learned how to do it, I felt liberated.
Helping me transition from the purely partisan to the analytical was the examples set by those who have done it successfully over the years. 
Specifically, I have always been intrigued by people whose ability to provide fair analysis is uncompromised by ideology or political leanings.
I’m thinking of people like one-time libertarian Boston radio talk show host David Brudnoy. Or pundits like David Gergen, Barry Rascovar, and Tim Russert.
Or Ron Smith.
I first tuned into Ron’s radio show on WBAL in 1991, during the time of the first Gulf War. His conservative views, which I shared, impressed me. But his thoughtfulness and willingness to engage people who disagreed with him impressed me more. 
Too many talk show hosts relish denigrating or shouting over the voices of people with whom they disagree. Ron never has. The only thing he ever asks of his callers is that they be able to defend their views, not that they agree with his.
Ron does not mind flaming liberals. He just doesn’t care for flaming idiots.
I was also immediately impressed by the complete absence of hesitancy with which Ron is willing to criticize the status quo – including the GOP status quo – when justified.
During the 1992 election cycle, Ron openly criticized President George H. W. Bush, stating on the air that he did not deserve reelection. I must admit…this upset me at the time.
It wasn’t that I disagreed with Ron’s specific criticisms. I just felt the alternative was worse than the status quo.  Why lend aid and comfort to the other side? I wondered.
Two decades later, I fully understand Ron's actions.
As I since learned through my own political journey, reform is only possible when problems are addressed. And, tight-lipped loyalty at the expense of the truth is ultimately destructive.
When I worked on Capitol Hill, I got to know Ron and his staff in the context of being press secretary to an ambitious, publicity-friendly boss. They were always gracious, no matter how spontaneous or last-minute my requests for rush hour call-in time were.
Later, I met Ron’s wife June during our mutual service to the Ehrlich Administration. Things kind of came full-circle for me when I appeared on Ron’s show a couple of times. I really enjoyed the experiences, but I especially liked our comparing of notes about local politics and players during commercial breaks.
As a conservative, Ron is a thoughtful, nuanced, sometimes critical voice. As a talk show host, his independent-mindedness is what defines him.
Today Ron announced to his listeners that he is facing a serious health challenge.
When I think of the struggle that lies ahead for him, I am reminded of something once said about another icon of outspokenness, Harry S Truman.
“The thing you need to know about Harry Truman,” David McCullough once quoted a Truman associate as saying, ”is that he is one tough SOB.”
Well, Ron Smith is one tough SOB, too.  
Feel better, Ron. We’re all thinking about you.

1 comment:

  1. Nice post. I certainly don't agree with about 90% of Ron's views, but I admired him for bucking the party line before the 2003 war with Iraq. A college friend of mine knew him when he interned at WBAL-AM in the mid-90s. While he didn't agree with Ron either, he said that he was one of the kindest people that he worked with in the radio industry.